TULIP GEMS
But grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. 2 Peter 3:18
[Home] [About Us] [Bible Articles] [Bible Nutrition] [Combat Vet] [The Great Commission] [Home Schooling] [Hyperinflation Survival Guide] [Passover] [Tulip Calvinism] [Contact Us]
THE PRESERVED WORD OF GOD IN ENGLISH (Part 3)
(Why KJV Only?)
(Which Bible Can We Trust?)
(Which Bible is the Most Accurate?)
“The
WORDS
of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified
seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt
PRESERVE
them from this generation for ever.” (Psalm 12:6-7) (Emphasis mine)
In our last editorial, we sought to prove that the King James Version (KJV)
is the preserved Word of God in English today. Another proof of this can be
found by taking a close look at two men—Westcott
and
Hort.
We’d like to discuss the Westcott and Hort Text and take a look at the beliefs
and agenda of these two men. Why? The
answer is simple. Almost all modern versions of the Bible are based on the
Westcott and Hort Greek New Testament.
Westcott and Hort form the basis for both the
ever evolving Nestle-Aland text and the
constantly changing United Bible Society text. Yet the Westcott
and Hort text is based largely on the Alexandrian Greek texts.
In our previous
March/April Editorial we saw what was wrong
with the Alexandrian texts (including the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus). We saw who
wrote them, and why true Christians rejected
them down through the centuries.
If you wish, you can click on the link to our
March/April Editorial and review our reasons for rejecting the Alexandrian
Greek texts. In this article, we’d like to focus on Westcott and Hort—their
beliefs and agenda.
WESTCOTT AND HORT
Westcott and Hort were Anglican priests and closet Catholics who lived in
England in the 19th century (1800s). It was the same time in which there was a
movement within the Anglican clergy to reunite with the Pope—led notably by
Cardinal Newman—an Anglican priest turned Roman Catholic prelate.
The beliefs and agenda of Westcott and Hort can be gleaned by reading their
personal correspondence preserved in their biographies.
While they were deciding
what does and does not belong in their revision of the Greek New Testament, they
were involved in:
Worship of the Virgin (Mariolatry).
Necromancy (spiritualism – calling up the dead in séances).
Speaking with ghosts (devils).
The Bible forbids all three activities. Worship of the Virgin
violates both the First and Second
of the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20). Necromancy, witchcraft, and consulting with
familiar spirits is forbidden in
Deuteronomy 18:10-12.
HERMES CLUB AND GHOSTLY GUILD
In 1845, as a Cambridge undergraduate, Westcott organized the Hermes Club.
Hermes is the Greek god of magic, the Lord of death, cunning and trickery.
According to Greek mythology, Hermes was a gifted speaker and scribe.
Westcott’s friend, Madame Blavatsky, a key founder of the New Age Movement,
wrote, “Satan and Hermes are all one,”
in her book, THE SECRET
DOCTRINE. She didn’t even pretend to be a Christian—she was a Luciferian.
In the 1850s Westcott, Hort and Benson (a future Archbishop of Canterbury)
founded the “Ghost Club” (also known as the Ghostly Guild). It promoted
“channeling” by which spirits speak
through a medium.
As Gail Riplinger so aptly points out in her book, New Age Bible Versions,
“The
bitter fountain which springs forth from the new bible versions flows from the
devils who “seduced” the scribes.”
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times some shall depart
from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils” (1
Timothy 4:1)
The modern translations (RSV, ASV, NASB, NIV, NEV and even the NKJV) have one
thing in common. They tend to agree against the
KJV in omitting hundreds of
words, phrases and entire verses.
These omitted words are not always archaic (old) words no longer used in Modern
English. The omitted words are words like “God” (omitted 66 times in the New
King James Version alone—and even more in other modern versions).
“God” is
not an archaic word. Neither is “Christ”,
“blood”, “virgin” or other
frequently omitted words. As Gail Riplinger points out in her book, New Age Bible Versions—these changes are
theological in nature.
Many of the basic doctrines of our faith are being
attacked in the new versions.
The deity of Christ, the virgin birth, our blood bought redemption, salvation by
grace through faith are all omitted
(or badly watered down) in the modern
versions.
When you read a modern Bible version, you may be reading (in some places)
exactly what the devils would like you to read—straight from their willing
mediums, Westcott and Hort. Let’s look at some statements made by Westcott and
Hort.
STATEMENTS FROM WESTCOTT
In 1842, Westcott wrote, “In the evening I go with Tom to the wizard….”
(Westcott, Vol. 1, p. 9)
On a trip to view a New Testament manuscript, Westcott made a pilgrimage to a
shrine of the Virgin. He commented about this, “God appears in many forms.”
In 1855 he wrote, “How certainly I should have been proclaimed a heretic.”
(Westcott, Vol. 1, p. 233)
In 1871 Westcott stated, “I shall aim at what is transcendental in many peoples
eyes…I suppose I am a communist by nature.” (Westcott, Vol. 1, p. 309)
In 1881 he admitted, “Our Bible as well as our Faith is a mere compromise.”
(Westcott, On the Canon of the New Testament: A General Survey, p. vii)
STATEMENTS FROM HORT
Hort referred to evangelical Christians at various times as “dangerous,
perverted, unsound and confused.” He called America “a standing menace to the
whole civilization.”
In 1848 Hort wrote, “The pure Romish view seems to me nearer and more likely to
lead to truth than the evangelical.” (Hort, Vol. 1, pp. 76-77.) “Protestantism
is only parenthetical and temporary.” (Hort, Vol. II, p. 31).
In 1856 he stated, “Campbell’s book on the Atonement…unluckily he knows nothing
except Protestant theology.” (Hort, Vol. 1, p. 322.)
AGENDA OF WESTCOTT AND HORT
Westcott and Hort had a friend named Philip Schaff. He was the President of the
Old and New Testament committees that formed the American Standard Version of
1901. He was a rank heretic and he advocated one world religion.
The University of Berlin call him “The theological mediator between East and
West.” Schaff mocked Christians, saying, “The vainly imagine that they possess
the monopoly on truth.”
He further stated, “The church must adjust…her doctrinal statements…to natural
science.” Churchman brought Schaff before the Pennsylvania Synod for heresy. The
Living Bible and NASB used Schaff’s 30,000 alterations to the Bible.
Schaff’s Parliament of World Religions, called itself
“Babel.” It first met in
Chicago in 1893. Schaff called it “the sum of my life and theological activity.”
It set the New Age movement in motion.
From Schaff, we can get a clearer view of the agenda of Westcott and Hort.
Schaff used their corrupt text to give us the ASV of 1901. He followed their
interpretation of theology and their view of “one world religion.”
WARFIELD, MACHEN AND ROBERTSON
The Westcott and Hort text unbelievably came into acceptance through the efforts
of two Bible believing Calvinist Presbyterians who had studied in Germany. Both
men rejected the higher criticism of the German liberals.
But both men came to accept “textual criticism” as scholarly and good. Both men
later taught at Princeton Theological Seminary. Their names were B.B. Warfield
and J. Gresham Machen. Their knowledge of Greek was impeccable.
Another professor, teaching at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in
Louisville, Kentucky also accepted the idea of textual criticism. His name was
A.T. Robertson. He, too, was a master scholar of Greek.
Did these men have any sinister intent? Only God knows.
They most probably had
no idea of the personal beliefs and agenda of Westcott and Hort.
Warfield, Machen and Robertson seemed to sincerely believe that the New
Testament needed to be updated in the light of modern historical research. Their
ideas soon gained acceptance in a number of evangelical seminaries.
Many pastors are seminary trained. This eventually resulted in new versions of
the Bible being accepted and used widely in evangelical and fundamental churches
and Bible colleges.
Though Warfield, Machen and Robertson may have been sincere, we believe they
were sincerely wrong. We need a return to the King James Bible.
Which Bible is the most accurate?
Which Bible can we trust? Why KJV only?
We believe that the King James Version (KJV)
is the preserved Word of God in the
English language today. Next time, Lord
willing, we’d like to take a closer look at the New King James Version.
Select Bibliography
Hort, Arthur LIFE AND LETTERS OF FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT. London: McMillan and
Co., 1896.
Riplinger, G.A. New Age Bible Versions. Ararat, Virginia: A.V. Publications
Corporation, 1993.
Westcott, Arthur THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF B.F. WESTCOTT. London: Macmillan and
Co., Ltd., 1903.
Preserved Word of God in English
Preserved Word of God in English (Part 2)
The Preserved Word of God in English (Part 4)
A Rebuttal of James White's book, The King James Only
Controversy
Do you love the King James Bible? Then you will love Scripture Songs sung from the KJV by Patti Vaillant.
Scripture Songs I - KJV Bible Songs
Scripture Songs II - King James Bible Music
Scripture Songs III - God's Word in song
Scripture Songs IV: Easily Memorize Powerful Bible Passages
Scripture Songs V - The Servent of Servents
Promote your Website with BidVertiser. Get $20 in FREE clicks.
Make money from your Website or Blog with BidVertiser
Tulip Gems is a Calvinistic Baptist web site that honors Jesus Christ and provides a free Hyperinflation Survival Guide. We offer free Bible Articles on several subjects, including Bible Nutrition , Creation Science versus Evolution , Passover , The Great Commission and Tulip Calvinism .
Which Bible can we trust? Which Bible is the most accurate? Why KJV only? Read our Which Bible series of articles for answers from both Scripture and history (including a Rebuttal of James White's book, The King James Only Controversy).
Who is Jesus Christ? Why KJV only? Why Home School your children? Jesus Christ is Lord and the KJV Bible is the Preserved Word of God in English. Finally, Scripture gives us compelling reasons to Home School our children. One very important reason is to lead them to Our Passover Lamb. We recommend Christ-centered Home Schooling Curriculum.
George Theiss is a combat veteran of Vietnam who now follows Lamb of God. He and his wife Christy have been married 34 years. They have 8 children.
Copyright 2002 through 2010 by George R. Theiss
[Home] [About Us] [Bible Articles] [Bible Nutrition] [Combat Vet] [Home Schooling] [Hyperinflation Survival Guide] [Passover] [Tulip Calvinism] [Contact Us]